Saturday, July 28, 2012

HelpAge International: Protecting the Rights of Older Persons


Protecting the Rights of Older People

10 reasons why we need to act



“Existing human rights mechanisms have lacked a systematic and comprehensive approach to the specific circumstances of older men and women”.

– Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General[1]



On 21 December 2010, the United Nations General Assembly established an Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing with a mandate to identify gaps in the protection of the rights of older people and ways in which these gaps can be addressed.



Here are ten reasons why the Working Group should recommend the strengthening of legally-binding standards on the rights of older people and the development of a new protection regime:



1. The number of older people worldwide is growing at an unprecedented pace. People over sixty years of age make up an ever greater percentage of the world population. Today, 760 million people are over 60; by 2050, that number will have risen to 2 billion. Older people already outnumber young children (0-4) and will outnumber children under 15 by 2050.[2] This trend is global. Today, 65 per cent of people over 60 live in less developed countries; by 2050, 80 per cent will.[3]

2. There is no dedicated protection regime for older people’s rights. While the rights of women, children, prisoners and people with disabilities are all protected through special international conventions or standards, no such standards exist for older people despite their specific vulnerability to human rights violations.[4]



3. There are clear gaps in protections available to older people in existing human rights standards. Only one of the existing human rights instruments explicitly prohibits age discrimination. This has resulted in a failure in many countries to address the multiple forms of discrimination older people face. Specific provisions regarding issues like elder abuse, long term and palliative care, are also absent from existing human rights standards.



4. Older people’s rights are neglected in the current human rights framework. UN and regional human rights bodies have largely ignored the rights of older people. For example, of 21,353 recommendations the Human Rights Council made during the entire first round of its peer to peer human rights review process of all UN member states (known as Universal Periodic Review), only 31 recommendations referred to “elderly” people or people of “old age”.[5]  



5. Age discrimination and ageism are widely tolerated across the world. Negative ageist attitudes towards old age and older people are deeply ingrained in many societies and, unlike other forms of prejudice and discriminatory behavior, are rarely acknowledged or challenged. This leads to widespread marginalization of older people, and is at the root of their isolation and exclusion.[6]



6. Older people are highly vulnerable to abuse, deprivation and exclusion. A growing body of evidence shows that many older people face abuse and violence in their own homes, and in institutional and long term care facilities. Many are also denied the right to make decisions about their personal finances, property and medical care.[7] They are often denied social security, access to health and productive resources, work, food and housing.[8]



7. Older people hold rights but are often treated with charity instead of as rights holders. Many governments see ageing predominantly as a social welfare or development issue. This reduces older people to recipients of charity rather than people who should enjoy their rights on the same basis as everybody else. A paradigm shift is needed from a social welfare to a rights-based approach.



8. National protections of older people’s rights are inconsistent. National standards on the rights of older people are patchy and inconsistent, as are protection regimes. As a result, few countries collect data on violations of the rights of older people. Violations will continue unaddressed as long as there is a gaping lack of information on their nature, prevalence, and cause.



9. Respect for older people’s rights benefits society as a whole. Violations of the rights of older people lead to exclusion, poverty, and discrimination of older people. Yet, older people make key contributions to any society through their experience and wisdom. Better protection of the rights of older people will allow societies to better capitalize on the potential that older people represent. There is clear evidence, for example, that when older people’s right to social security is realized, there is a positive impact on reduction of poverty rates, restoration of older people’s dignity, reduction of child labour and increased enrolment in schools.[9]



10. Older people are an increasingly powerful group. Older people represent a rapidly growing constituency and are among the most loyal election participants. When they vote, they can have significant political influence.[10] Governments need to address their rights and needs or they risk losing support from this increasingly large block of voters.





Endorsed by:



HelpAge International

Human Rights Watch



[1] UN General Secretary's report, “Follow-up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing” in 2009, A/64/127
[2] UNDESA, World Population Prospects, the 2012 Revision, http://esa.un.org/wpp/ Visited 9 July 2012
[3] UNDESA, Current Status of the Social Situation, Wellbeing, Participation in Development and Rights of Older People Worldwide, 2011, page 3
[4] Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 20 April 2012, E/2012/51, page 4
[5] Word searches and analysis were undertaken on the database of UPR-info, http://www.upr-info.org/database/  accessed July 2012.
[6] Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 20 April 2012, E/2012/51, page 7
[7] See for example, Situation of the rights of older people in all regions of the world – Report of the Secretary General, A/66/173, 2011 http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=A/66/173
[8] Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 20 April 2012, E/2012/51, page 1-12 12
[9] Knox-Vydmanov, “Social protection as development policy: social pensions in the global South”, Die Alten Der Welt: neue Wege der Alterssicherung im globalen Norden und Suden, 2011, pages 285 - 287
[10] UNDESA, Current Status of the Social Situation, Well-being, Participation in Development and Rights of Older People Worldwide, Dec 2011, page 56

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Adult & Elder Guardianship Around the World

IGN - The International Guardianship Network has just published a wonderful and most helpful web interface that includes a global perspective on adult and elder guardianship legal regimes from countries around the world. This is an excellent tool to receive a broad and comparative perspective on this important field of elder law.
The web address is:

http://www.international-guardianship.com/guardianship.htm

Friday, June 29, 2012

The 2012 European Year for Active Ageing

2012 - European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations

The year is intended to raise awareness of the contribution that older people make to society. It seeks to encourage policymakers and relevant stakeholders at all levels to take action with the aim of creating better opportunities for active ageing and strengthening solidarity between generations.

What is active ageing?

Active ageing means growing old in good health and as a full member of society, feeling more fulfilled in our jobs, more independent in our daily lives and more involved as citizens. No matter how old we are, we can still play our part in society and enjoy a better quality of life. The challenge is to make the most of the enormous potential that we harbour even at a more advanced age. The European Year 2012 seeks to promote active ageing in three areas:
Employment – as life expectancy increases across Europe, pension ages are rising, but many fear that they will not be able to stay in their current jobs or to find another job until they can retire on a decent pension. We must give older workers better chances in the labour market.
Participation in society – retiring from one's job does not mean becoming idle. The contribution of older people to society as carers for others, typically their own parents or spouses and their grandchildren is often overlooked and so is their role as volunteers. The European Year seeks to ensure greater recognition of what older people bring to society and create more supportive conditions for them.
Independent living – our health declines as we grow old, but a lot can be done to cope with this decline. And quite small changes in our environment can make a big difference to people suffering from various health impairments and disabilities. Active ageing also means empowering us as we age so that we can remain in charge of our own lives as long as possible.

EU funding

How to promote active ageing in Europe - EU support to local and regional actors

Facts and figures

Eurobarometer Special Survey on Active ageing
Eurostat - A statistical portrait of the EU 2012: Active ageing and solidarity between generations

Success to the MDAC Mental Disability Advocacy Center regarding Guardianship



Russian Constitutional Court criticises "abusive" guardianship law
 St. Petersburg (Russia) and Budapest (Hungary), 28 June 2012. In a case initiated by MDAC, the Russian Constitutional Court yesterday quashed as unconstitutional the lack of alternatives to plenary guardianship. An estimated 300,000 people are currently under guardianship, all stripped of their personhood and of their legal rights. The Court ordered the parliament to enact a new law which better respects people's decision-making capacity.
  Since 1982, Irina Delova has lived in "Social Care Institution No. 3" in St. Petersburg. With almost 1,100 it is one of the largest institutions in Russia. Until 2010 she had managed her own money, but the institution wanted to control it. They applied to a district court which deprived Ms Delova of her legal capacity. The institution became her guardian and she was not allowed to access her own money. At the district court hearing, psychiatrists testified that Ms Delova was able to manage her money for every-day purposes, but she needed some support for more complex transactions.
 "The Constitutional Court has taken an important step in recognising the obvious: that the law should provide alternatives to Irina Delova, as it should to everyone else: stripping personhood and dignity should never be lawful," said Oliver Lewis, MDAC Executive Director. "We call on the Federal Government and members of the Duma to abolish plenary guardianship altogether, and introduce supported decision-making, in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities."
 Full deprivation of legal capacity is the only measure available in Russian law to enable people with disabilities to make decisions. MDAC has been campaigning for reform of the law since launching a report on guardianship and human rights in Russia in 2007. In 2010 the European Court of Human Rights started to chip away at the system in the case of Shtukaturov v. Russia. In a separate case brought on Mr. Shtukaturov's behalf, the Constitutional Court struck down numerous procedural aspects of Russian guardianship law which were implemented through legislative amendments in 2011. However, until now, the substantive guardianship law had not been judicially criticised.
 Ms Delova was represented by Dmitri Bartenev, an attorney practicing in St. Petersburg who is MDAC's contracted Russian attorney. The case was supported by MDAC as well as the St. Petersburg NGO "Perspektivy" and the Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia.
 Commenting on the decision, Dmitri Bartenev said, "This is a historic moment for Russia in combatting the social exclusion of hundreds of thousands of people with disabilities. Depriving someone of their legal capacity is routinely used by family members and local government to then to lock people up in an institution for the rest of their lives."
 MDAC will make the full text of the decision in Russian available on its website as soon as it is available and will post an English translation shortly. MDAC's litigation in Russia has been supported financially by the Open Society Foundations. MDAC is the only international NGO that challenges these violations, which would otherwise remain hidden. We need your help to continue taking cases such as Ms Delova's to court, creating a legal deterrent to prevent future abuses of this kind. The change MDAC creates is long-lasting and will ultimately improve the lives of many future generations of people. Your support is needed because, in all cases, the clients who we help have no funds, and legal aid is not available to pay lawyers. To donate, please click here.
Mental Disability Advocacy Center
Hercegprímás u. 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
phone: +36 1 413 2730 | fax: +36 1 413 2739 | email: mdac@mdac.info  

Thursday, June 7, 2012

The San Jose Charter on the Rights of Older Persons

The final outcome of the III Intergovernmental Conference on Ageing in Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)] that was held on May 2012 in San Jose, has produced an important international document on the rights of older persons.
The document, known as the
SAN JOSÉ CHARTER ON THE RIGHTS OF OLDER PERSONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN
is yet another important step by the Latin America countries to be the leaders in promoting and advancing the rights of older persons via regional human rights instruments.
Here is the link to the full document:
http://www.ngocoa-ny.org/events/regional-conferences/san-jose-charter-on-the.html